Another decision that linking is, well, just linking

Today’s Slaw post:

In a decision dated June 21, 2012, the Federal Court made it clear that, for purposes of copyright, using a hyperlink is not copying the material it points to. That seems obvious, but its nice to see it recognized by the courts. The  Warman and National Post v Fournier  decision also said that – at least in the circumstances of the case at bar – reproducing 1/4 of an original article was not a substantial part for copyright purposes, and was thus not a copyright violation.

This follows a Supreme Court of Canada decision last fall that said that a hyperlink to defamatory material is not in itself defamatory.

http://harrisonpensa.com/lawyers/david-canton/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.