Those readers interested in privacy matters should take a look at the “Pipeda and Canadian Privacy Law” blawg. It is published by David Fraser, a lawyer in Halifax, and a fellow member of the Canadian IT Law Association.
A Globe and Mail article says “Ottawa is about to blunder in cyberspace, lawyers and academics warn.”
Canada is considering reform of its copyright laws. The standing committee on Canadian Heritage has just submitted a report that copyright experts are denouncing as being balanced far too much in favour of creators of material. The proposed reforms, if passed, would affect anyone who has a photo taken of their children, or anyone who surfs the net.
The World Trade Organization released its report in which it concluded that U.S. restrictions on on-line offshore Internet gambing violated international trade agreements. The complaint was launched by the Caribbean nation of Antigua and Barbuda, which claims to have suffered losses to its economy because of the restrictions. The United States will of course appeal.
In an article in the Toronto Star, Professor Michael Geist finds a common thread among several recent Canadian matters – including satellite radio hearings, VOIP hearings, a recent Quebec court ruling that some regulations against gray market satellite TV are unconstitutional, the music downloading litigation, and copyright reform.
That common thread is that the cultural policies that Canada imposes on these matters are not working. The article questions whether Canadian cultural, broadcast, and telecommunications policies (at least in their current form) can survive in the age of the Internet.
By DAVID CANTON — London Free Press – November 6 2004
E-mail has revolutionized our workplaces, made workers more efficient and freed us from our desks. But this same communication technology also poses particular privacy risks that need to be carefully considered to minimize accidental disclosure of personal information.
A recent decision by the privacy commissioner of Canada is an example of that risk.
Letters sent by traditional mail can be addressed incorrectly, but e-mail takes the risk of privacy infringement to a whole new level. It’s easy enough to do, as anyone who has accidentally clicked on the “reply to all” button can attest.
itbusiness.ca published an article yesterday saying that Canada is unlikey to imitate U.S. e-voting efforts. It has an interesting discussion about some Canadian municipalties that have experimented with electronic voting. The article suggests e-voting through various means – not just voting machines – may be adopted more quickly for municipal elections because the ballots are more complex.
The privacy community has been anticipating the release of this report. The US Patriot Act (among others) allows US authorities to see personal information of Canadian individuals if that information is in the possession of US companies, or Canadian subsidiaries of US companies. Given the trend to outsource IT resources, this is not just theoretical. Any Canadian business that engages others to provide data processing or storage should consider this issue.
DAVID CANTON, For the London Free Press – October 30 2004
As the United States presidential election nears, the issue of technology and voting has been under debate.
Electronic voting alleviates the need for the traditional paper ballot to be marked and counted during election day — but is not universally trusted.
In Canada, we continue to rely on the paper-based voting system, while Americans are embracing technology to reform their voting system.
DAVID CANTON, For the London Free Press – October 23 2004
Open source software is becoming a popular option. Open source software (OSS) is software where the source code — or human readable code — is readily available, such as Linux.
Many are under the misconception that one must make public any new source code one creates that is in related to open source software.
DAVID CANTON, For the London Free Press – October 16 2004
Big Brother could be watching your every move as you drive. Your driving habits — from how fast you are driving to whether you fastened your seatbelt — are all being recorded.
Most cars are equipped with tiny “black boxes” known as event data recorders (EDRs). These tiny computer chips perform a function similar to that of the black boxes used to record data in airplanes.